<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>CADFanatic - Latest Comments in MoldflowXpress is No Mo&amp;#8217; in 2008</title><link>http://cadfanatic.disqus.com/</link><description>A website about SolidWorks and the CAD community in general.</description><atom:link href="https://cadfanatic.disqus.com/moldflowxpress_is_no_mo8217_in_2008/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:05:34 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: MoldflowXpress is No Mo&amp;#8217; in 2008</title><link>https://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/#comment-4395022</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Is moldflowxpress able to be composited as an add-on for SW08??&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael B</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 17:05:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MoldflowXpress is No Mo&amp;#8217; in 2008</title><link>https://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/#comment-4395023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Huge surprise gave me the 2008 version, I was just about to use the MoldflowXpress as usual and it was't placed anywhere, we were really used to work this tool. Totally disappointing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oscar Gómez</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 20:06:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MoldflowXpress is No Mo&amp;#8217; in 2008</title><link>https://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/#comment-4395024</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like it's time for Solidworks to buy them. :-\&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gary Hall</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 11:31:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: MoldflowXpress is No Mo&amp;#8217; in 2008</title><link>https://www.cadfanatic.com/2007/03/moldflowxpress-is-no-mo-in-2008/#comment-4395025</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow....that is really disappointing to hear.  I personally have only used it once or twice and it seemed to work well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ricky Jordan&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rickyjordan.net" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.rickyjordan.net"&gt;http://www.rickyjordan.net&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ricky Jordan</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:46:30 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>